AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Logger pro uncertainty3/23/2023 ![]() Logger Lite This computer program is used with LabQuest 2, LabQuest, LabQuest Mini, LabPro, or GoLink. Logger Pro 2 This computer program is used with ULI or Serial Box Interface. I thank musician and all-around brilliant guy, Brad Williams, for pointing this article out to me. Logger Pro 3 This computer program is used with LabQuest 2, LabQuest, LabQuest Mini, LabPro, or GoLink. Give your file a name and save it in the folder you created. So if the 95 measurements fall into a range of plus 0.5 C and minus -0.5 C away from the 100 measurement mean, than the sensor uncertainty as written in the data sheet will be 0.5 C. ![]() include uncertainties for the fit parameters. In simple terms, measurement uncertainty as stated in a datasheet is taken as the range of the 95 closest measurements to the average (mean) of 100 measurements. Calibration: Experiment > Calibrate (more details. Go to File along the top of the window and select Save As. Computer with Data Studio and LoggerPro software, Science Workshop interface with Motion Detector, hooked. When does data collection begin Experiment > Triggering (not available with all sensors). More pointedly: u ntil scientists devise and conduct more tests like this one, we may need to continue with a skeptical stance toward the application of mathamatical formulas and AB/ABX testing as the end-all of our windows into human perception.Īs always, keep a really open mind! The Aesthetic Revolution will be beautiful. Load your video and do your data collection. In no way am I claiming that my hunch about AB testing is vindicated by this new paper, but I do think it points to some interesting new areas of research that could reveal more about the limits of human perception, and about the different dimensions of sound (time-based events and frequency based events) that we can perceive and how those dimensions interact. Some readers may realize that I'm posting this because of my concerns over the blanket acceptance of AB and ABX testing as the "gold standard" or human perceptual testing. I cannot claim to understand the math (the Fourier Unicertainty Principle lies at the heart of the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem, etc), but I can see that this study shows that the assumed limits of human auditory perception as figured by the Fourier Uncertainty Principle were too narrow - especially when expert listeners (a pro musician and an electronic music producer) are tested. on a combination of statistical data and professional judgment. This is a fascinating article about a brand new study in human auditory perception that is showing that there have been "naive" applications of mathematical formulas onto our understanding of human auditory perception. The third paper examines the uncertainty in geometry and construction of the rubble.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |